• Free Newsletter Sign Up

  • 757-564-7311
    • jumpin up

    Home

    Welcome to CORE FITNESS Performance Training Center website.

    Are you -

    Ready to start “playing hard” with amazing benefits?

    Ready to start today what you promised you would do yesterday?

    Ready to make progress with a program tailored for you and not trying to “fit” you into a mass produced program?

    Ready to “Change Your Body…Transform Your Life”?

     

    If you answered yes to any of the above questions or just want to be healthier and fitter, then, CORE FITNESS should be your first choice.  We feel we have the best fitness training facility but talk is cheap. We want you to come meet our staff, meet other members, and give us a chance to earn your business.

    Please feel to stop by to take a tour of our facility, call us at 757-564-7311 or shoot us an email.

     

    “Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness.”        Edward Stanley

     


    Latest from the blog:

    The Importance of Mental and Physical Maintenance

    Going for Gold

    Behind the scenes with an official physical therapist for the US national rowing team

    By Brian W. Ferrie

    Posted on: October 23, 2012
    Vol. 23 • Issue 22 • Page 16

    It has been said that rowing offers the most intense full-body workout of any sport. Whether that’s true or not is probably a matter for subjective debate, but it’s easy to see why the claim would be made. Rowing pushes muscles and bones to their limits, while revving cardiovascular systems into overdrive. The entire body acts as an engine to propel a boat across the water as fast as possible. All the while, natural conditions such as wind, cold, sleet, heat or the drenching water itself can taunt competitors. It’s a test of strength, fitness, endurance, will and commitment.

    Injuries can naturally result from such a pursuit, made all the more complicated by the traditional rowing code of suffering in silence. Pain is something to be conquered, not capitulated to. It’s part of the test. Rowers are motivated not only by proving to themselves they can overcome any obstacle, but also the fear of letting down their teammates in the boat, brothers or sisters all. So how do you convince competitors who pride themselves on being toughest of the tough that sometimes the greater good is served by getting out of the boat to rest and rehab? That’s part of the challenging job of Marc Nowak, PT, MSPT, who for more than a decade has provided physical therapy to members of US Rowing.

    Tremendous Training

    “It amazes me how much training they do, and how they can mentally and physically tolerate those levels for such a long period of time,” Nowak told ADVANCE. “For most rowers in the national team program, you’re talking about at least a quadrennium. So that’s four to six years of working out constantly, six days a week, two to three practices a day. It’s high-load, long-duration workouts. High repetitive-stress injury levels, just from the constant training. And they’re amazingly tolerant, upbeat and motivated. To be able to do that on a daily basis is tough. Particularly when injury is sustained, because they tend to downplay their injury level.”

    US Rowing is headquartered in Princeton, NJ, which is also site of the clinic where Nowak works-Sports Physical Therapy Institute (SPTI). Nowak began working for SPTI in 1992 and specifically the Princeton location in 2002. What began as a few referrals to treat both male and female national team rowers eventually grew to Nowak becoming an official physical therapist for US Rowing. Along the way, he traveled to the 2004 Olympics in Athens, 2008 Olympics in Beijing and most recently the 2012 Olympics in London to provide therapy to national team rowers. For most of the last decade, Nowak served as the only therapy provider for both the

    Archive ImageA
    Marc Nowak, PT, MSPT, an official physical therapist for US rowing, has been providing treatment to the men’s and women’s national teams for more than a decade. Here he works with Ian Silveira, a member of the national team program, at a boathouse in Princeton, NJ, where US Rowing is headquartered.

    men’s and women’s teams. However, in 2010, the men’s team moved its training operations to Chula Vista, CA, where they now receive treatment from another official team therapist, Reiko Takahashi, PT. The women’s team has maintained its training operations in Princeton, where Nowak continues to provide exclusive PT treatment.

    “If you ask a rower with a rib stress fracture what her pain level is, the truth is she basically has pain with every breath she takes, but she’ll say it’s a 4 or 5 on a scale of 1-10,” Nowak related. “The average person would say it’s a 9 or 10. So I typically need to take their pain scale and multiply it. That’s what concerns me most. Particularly for certain athletes, if they even start complaining of a problem, I’ll get them in for treatment. Because if you give that problem a week under those stress levels, it’s going to become major.”

    Rib injuries tend to be the most common that Nowak encounters among elite-level rowers. These could range from stress reactions to stress fractures. There are also thoracic spine injuries, shoulder complex issues, and lumbar spine herniations or dysfunction. Erin Cafaro, a gold medalist in both 2008 and 2012 for the US women’s eight-person boat, can speak from experience about many of these occupational hazards.

    “My first year in the program, which was 2007, I tore the quadratus lumborum in my back,” she toldADVANCE. ”Then in the spring of 2008, right before the Olympics, I broke a rib. Marc was able to rehab me back into the selection process so that I made the boat for Beijing. In 2009 and 2010, I stayed pretty healthy, maintaining my back and ribs with the help of exercises from Marc. Then in 2011, a month before the World Championships, I broke two ribs – one on each side. We were racing abroad when the first one broke, so Marc wasn’t there to convince me to stop, and that’s probably why I broke the second one too.”

    When Cafaro speaks about the job Nowak has done for her, equal parts respect, admiration and amazement emanate from her words.

    “I really don’t know what I or the rest of the girls would do without Marc. I literally have his number saved in my phone as ‘The Magic Worker.’ Once they catch on with the national program, most of the girls go see Marc at his clinic at least once a week, even if they aren’t injured or out from practice, just to maintain. Because you always have a weakness cropping up. Maybe it’s your back or ribs or both. You want to make sure it doesn’t get to that degree where you have to stop training or rowing because of injury. He basically helps keep us in the game.”

    Different Strokes

    There are two distinct types of rowing – sweeping and sculling. Sweeping is how rowers are typically introduced to the sport, even if they eventually become scullers. In sweeping, the practitioner uses both hands to hold one oar, rowing on only the port or starboard side of the boat. A fellow rower sweeps on the other side to provide balance. At the international level, there are three types of sweep boats – pair (two rowers), four and eight. In sculling, meanwhile, the rower holds an oar in each hand. International scullers may compete in the single, double or quadruple event. In some competitions, there are also lightweight and heavyweight divisions for the different strokes.

    Nowak hasn’t encountered an increased frequency of injury among one rowing type compared to the other. “I’ve seen just as many injuries with scullers and sweepers,” he related. “A lot has to do with sheer training volume as much as the style of rowing. So you’ll have fatigue setting in, overtraining, overstressed tissue just due to repetition. And that will attack both rowing groups.”

    He noted, however, that injuries to sweepers are more commonly due to musculoskeletal imbalance.

    “There tends to be more asymmetry in the sweep rowers, since you’re pulling predominantly from one side. So you commonly see strains or sprains more on one side than the other. It also sets up mild, and sometimes more than mild, functional scoliosis. Because a sweep rower has been sweeping for many years. At the high school and college levels, competitors mainly sweep. In the United States, most scullers don’t start that discipline until they’re already elite as a sweep. I think people who have sculled from the beginning are a little better off since they tend to be more technically savvy and have trained both sides of their system. But it’s just not that common.”

    Nowak did say he believes female rowers are more susceptible to injury than male.

    “Particularly for rib stress injuries, you’ll see predominance with women. And also with the lightweight men, although probably to a lesser degree. I think it has to do with force and work-to-bodyweight ratio. The heavyweight men are often 6-foot-4 or 6-foot-5, 200-pound-plus guys with a lot of muscle mass. The women are not as strong in the upper half of their bodies, especially the shoulders. And the lightweight men pull just as hard as the bigger guys, but they don’t have the weight or often the length to help with that. So your lever is shorter and you’re working harder. Therefore your breakdown is usually a little more frequent.”

    Male or female, lightweight or heavyweight, Nowak couldn’t speak more highly of rowers as a patient population.

    “They’re the best,” he said. “Very disciplined, educated and responsive to treatment. They want to row so they’re very motivated and encouraged to eliminate their problem, get back in the boat and compete with their teammates. They’re just an awesome group to interact with, very appreciative with a great sense of humor. I worry about them more because they won’t limit themselves until breakage. That’s their motivation level. They are elite and will take punishment you or I would not. There’s a reason why they’re out there.”

    London Calls

    Certainly Nowak’s Olympic experiences have ranked among the highlights of his involvement with US Rowing over the years. He talked to ADVANCE about his experience in England a few months ago for the 2012 Games, where he helped treat both the men’s and women’s teams.

    “London was great. The setup for rowing was wonderful and the volunteer system was amazing. Whatever help you needed, they had people there to guide you along the way. They put up tents for the rowers with exercise bikes and [ergometer] machines. We had a tent for rehab right at the water. The venue itself was beautiful and the crowd was amazing. I’ve never heard cheering for rowing before like there was in London. The Brits are very into it and the sheer crowd noise when rowers were coming to the finish line was just deafening.”

    To be part of that level of enthusiasm for the sport was exciting not only for Nowak, but also the rowers themselves. “Entering the last 500 meters with that kind of crowd, none of them had experienced it before, even at other Olympics,” Nowak added. “It was just tremendous.”

    Overall, the US men’s and women’s teams performed well, combining for three medals, with two other US boats each coming within 0.3 seconds of the podium.

    “I got to watch the events on closed-circuit TV,” Nowak related. “You stop working, run over, catch a race on TV, jump up and down and then get back to work again because there are other rowers who need treatment. It’s that kind of experience, which is very special. You’re in it and watching it, dealing with the good or bad. For the rowers, if they come back to the tent and didn’t do well, you’re trying to help with their frustrations in addition to their physical ailments. But when they do well, everything feels great to them. Nothing cures any problem better than a gold medal.”

    Brian W. Ferrie is managing editor of ADVANCE and can be reached at bferrie@advanceweb.com

    Birke Baehr: What’s wrong with our food system

    A Grain of Truth: Should You Avoid Grains?

    A Grain of Truth: Should You Avoid Grains?

    by Ryan Andrews

    Summary: Against the grain? Ryan Andrews is not. In this article he explains why he prefers to eat grains. And why, unless you’re intolerant to grains, you might consider them too.

    If somebody is writing about grains in 2012, it’s probably to tell you not to eat them.

    That’s because grains are a hot topic in the nutrition world. And rightly so. North Americans consume enormous quantities of grain, probably too much, both directly and indirectly.

    We eat grain in the form of cereal, bread, pasta, baked products, as a component in many processed foods, and, of course, by itself.

    Meanwhile, animals raised for meat are enormous grain-eaters too. So, when considering grain consumption, it’s important to think about how grains affect our health and our environment.

    There’s much to be said both for and against grain as a component of our diet. But when it comes right down to it, coach Ryan Andrews is personally in favour of eating grains.

    Here’s why.

    1. Yes, some people are intolerant to grains.

    Grains contain chemicals that can cause various health problems for susceptible people.

    Gluten, found in wheat, is a particularly common food intolerance. (Some evidence suggests that modern wheat varieties are more problematic.) However, other grains such as oats, rye, barley, and corn can also cause similarly negative health effects for some folks.

    But people are intolerant of lots of different foods, not just grains. If a food or drink makes you feel lousy, don’t consume it. Whether it’s wheat, kale, blueberries, or holy water – listen to your body.

    Meanwhile, if you aren’t intolerant to a certain food, the food goes along with your values, the food provides nutrients, and you enjoy the food, then why would you waste time trying to avoid it?

    2. Grain in a person’s diet says nothing about their health or fitness.

    I know people who don’t eat grains and they are muscular, lean and healthy.

    I also know people who eat grains and they are muscular, lean and healthy.

    In other words, as a Precision Nutrition coach, I’ve personally worked with thousands of clients. And I have yet to see a meaningful correlation between appropriate grain consumption and ill health.

    3. When I eliminate grains, I eat more vegetables, fruits, nuts, and other foods.

    While that may sound like a good thing at first, I assure you it’s not. In fact, when I eliminate grains, I overeat on other foods. This leads to body fat gain and lethargy after meals. Not good.

    Through self-experimentation, I’ve learned that eating grains helps me moderate my total food intake and improve my health.

    But this isn’t just about me.

    Again, I’ve coached thousands. And I see the same thing over and over again with my clients. Fewer grains eaten equals more meat, nuts and fruit. For a lot of them, that means more body fat.

    4. Another argument against grains? They contain toxins.

    So we’re told: Eat potatoes instead. Wait, potatoes contain toxins too.

    Okay, eat green veggies instead. Wait, green veggies contain toxins too.

    Wait… pretty much every naturally occurring food in existence contains toxins. We ingest toxins every day in low doses from all foods. Especially if we eat plant foods; they’re simply part of most plants’ defense systems.

    What about just eating animals? Well, if those animals eat plant foods, the toxins accrete in their tissues. So, yes, even animal foods contain these same naturally occurring toxins.

    We can’t get away from them no matter which foods we choose. Don’t believe me? See the references below.

    Many scholarly publications list the naturally occurring toxic chemicals in common foods. Heck, you can even find nicotine in familiar vegetables!

    It sounds scary. But think about this for a minute.

    The real issue isn’t whether or not a food contains any toxins. This issue is, how much of the toxic chemical is in the food, and does the chemical occur at a level that can be toxic to humans.

    If you really want to eliminate naturally occurring toxins, eat more processed foods. (Now there’s a solution for you!)

    Never forget: The major “toxins” that have been proven to promote disease and harm our health are excess food/ calories, processed fats, sugars, and processed meats.

    5. Our ancestors probably ate at least some grains.

    Long ago in some far away land, claims the theory, nutrition was simple and grains weren’t eaten.

    Fine. Neither were raw sprouted grain-less granola, hemp protein, kale chips, and honey chia bars. All of which I’ve consumed in the past week.

    In other words, just because something wasn’t eaten then, doesn’t mean we can’t eat it now.

    Besides, data indicate that grains probably were eaten back in the day:

    Uh-Oh Paleo: Grains Were Part of Hunter-Gatherers’ Diet
    So Long and Thanks for All the Fish – Is Paleo Dieting Finished?
    Thirty Thousand-Year-Old Evidence of Plant Food Processing
    The Paleo-Diet: Not The Way To A Healthy Future
    Did Cavemen Eat Bread?
    Built Like a Neanderthal 1
    Built Like a Neanderthal 2

    6. From an environmental perspective, grains make sense.

    Our food choices have a monumental influence on the amount of fossil fuel energy we consume. Check out these estimates:

    Grain/bean proteins require 2 units of fossil fuel energy / unit of protein they provide
    A broiler chicken requires 4 units of fossil fuel energy / unit of protein it provides
    Milk & pork require 14 units of fossil fuel energy / unit of protein they provide
    Eggs require 39 units of fossil fuel energy / unit of protein they provide
    Beef requires 40 units of fossil fuel energy / unit of protein it provides
    Lamb requires 57 units of fossil fuel energy / unit of protein it provides

    “But Ryan, you’d have to eat pounds and pounds of grains to get enough protein….”

    Don’t care. I eat enough protein and take care of it in other ways.

    The livestock population in the U.S. consumes more than 7 times as much grain as is consumed directly by the entire American population. If this grain were diverted to human consumption, we could feed more people.

    No matter how much you dislike grains, you will dislike the apocalypse more.

    7. But, I read Wheat Belly!

    So did I, and I’m not totally convinced.

    While it’s an eye-opening read, it’s still a popular press book full of interpretations of scientific data. And, often, smart people can reach different conclusions based on the same data.

    If you’re interested in an extensive discussion of the claims of Wheat Belly, check out this fully referenced review article:

    Wheat Belly—An Analysis of Selected Statements and Basic Theses from the Book

    Ingrained?

    In the end, here’s my argument…

    Grains can provide key nutrients (helping prevent malnutrition);
    are low in calorie density (helping prevent excess body fat);
    are earth friendly (preventing the apocalypse); and
    can help decrease our risk for chronic disease (cancer, heart disease, diabetes).

    Of course, if you can’t tolerate grains, or any other food, and they make you feel bad, stop eating them! (Duh).

    However, if you can tolerate them, don’t fall for the hype. Grains aren’t the next dietary evil. Excess food/calories, processed fats, sugars, and processed meats are what we still need to be concerned with.

    [Editor's note: Ryan Andrews, is fit, lean, and strong. His body fat is less than 5% year-round. And he's got a great blood profile. With 2 Masters degrees - one in Exercise Science and one in Nutrition - he's single-handedly worked with thousands of clients through our Lean Eating Coaching Program. The point of saying all this? Well, it's easy to dismiss some random blogger's opinion. However, to dismiss the opinion of someone like Ryan - ripped, healthy, educated, and experienced - is folly. So, even if you disagree, his thoughts are worthy of consideration].
    References

    Pimentel D & Pimentel M. Sustainability of meat-based and plant-based diets and the environment. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;78:660S-663S.

    Ames BN, Profet M, Gold LS. Dietary pesticides (99.99% all natural). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1990;87:7777-7781.

    Ames BN. Natural Carcinogens: They’re found in many foods. Health & Environment Digest.

    Domino EF, Hornbach E, Demana T. The nicotine content of common vegetables. N Engl J Med 1993;329:437.